Re: [測試] 看門狗國外測試含CPU(轉) - PC_Shopping板

看板 PC_Shopping
作者 arrenwu (鍵盤流戰鬼)
標題 Re: [測試] 看門狗國外測試含CPU(轉)
時間 Sat May 31 07:11:43 2014

今天發現 Toms Hardware 也有一篇看門狗的 Review

節錄一些內容:
1. GPU: Low Detail, 1920*1080, FXAA
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/watch-dogs-pc-performance,3833-5.html

Results: Low Detail, 1920x1080 - Benchmarked: How Well Does Watch Dogs Run On your PC?

We retain the same entry-level settings used on the previous page, but increase the resolution from 720p to 1080p. Also, the Radeon R7 260X and GeForce GTX 750 Ti are added to the list of tested cards, reflecting their greater graphics processing poten... ...

測試時使用的CPU是 Intel Core i7-3960X (Sandy Bridge-E), 3.3 GHz

R7-260x 就可以達到 Minimum FPS 60，我想其他結果不太重要了。

2. GPU: Ultra Detail, 1920*1080, FXAA enabled
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/watch-dogs-pc-performance,3833-6.html

Results: Ultra Detail, 1920x1080 - Benchmarked: How Well Does Watch Dogs Run On your PC?

This time around we keep our 1920x1080 resolution, but increase graphics detail to the Ultra preset. Quality improves noticeably; however, graphics hardware is also pushed much more aggressively.
It takes a Radeon R9 270 or GeForce GTX 760 to rend... ...

測試時使用的CPU是 Intel Core i7-3960X (Sandy Bridge-E), 3.3 GHz

Min FPS Avg FPS
GTX Titan 51 65.2
(OC to 780Ti)
R9-290x 34 46.4
R9-280 31 40.7
GTX-760 31 39.4
R9-270 33 38
GTX-660 13 34.7
GTX-750Ti 26 31.5
R7-260x 8 28

在文章中提到，GTX-660 和 R7-260x 的 Min FPS 和 Avg FPS 有很怪異的大落差，
但是多次測試後，結果仍然是那樣，Min FPS就是會這麼低。

3. CPU: Ultra Detail, 1920*1080, FXAA enabled
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/watch-dogs-pc-performance,3833-8.html

Results: CPU Benchmarks - Benchmarked: How Well Does Watch Dogs Run On your PC?

In order to explore CPU scaling, I used the overclocked GeForce GTX Titan on multiple platforms and the Ultra detail preset at 1080p.
Intel and, to a lesser extent, AMD will like this: even pushing the Ultra detail preset, Watch Dogs is a CPU-bound ... ...

測試時使用的GPU是 GTX Titan (OC to 780Ti)

Min FPS Avg FPS
i7-3960x 51 65.2
FX-8350 38 49.1
i5-3550 37 47.5
FX-6300 28 36.3
FX-4170 24 33.2
i3-3220 24 32.9

--
「原、原來你是負責戰鬥的……！」

「如果是的話，你們早就死光了，我只不過是糾紛調解人而已。」

--

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 67.194.232.103
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PC_Shopping/M.1401491507.A.B49.html

※ 同主題文章:

[測試] 看門狗國外測試含CPU(轉)

05-30 13:30 cp296633.

Re: [測試] 看門狗國外測試含CPU(轉)

05-31 07:11 arrenwu.

推 obov:你的小貓簽名檔ㄋ1F 05/31 07:16

換一下簽名檔咩～

推 andrewlol527:身寸ㄦ ~*2F 05/31 08:01

推 nfsong:推3F 05/31 08:03

跟前一個測試的結果比起來，我覺得Tom's Hardware CPU 的結果比較接近預期。

→ cp296633:上一篇是步行,這篇好像是開車畢竟沒內建benchmark不過這顆6c12t的i7普通人玩不起啊XDD..主板八千起4F 05/31 08:50

→ an138:這篇怎麼又變的CPU差異很大了XD6F 05/31 10:26

推 species:推7F 05/31 10:33

推 as111531:FX 4170/6300/8350的FPS成長有點詭異
不過測試手法本來就存在差異就不拿別篇來比較結果了仔細看了一下tom's這篇的fps曲線，FHD/QHD/CPU這三個條件似乎不是同一場景測的，但I7 3970X +TITAN卻重覆出現在CPU/FHD的圖中，內文中沒提到遊戲場景是否一致
會有這樣的質疑是同CPU下290X在FHD/QHD的測試結果差異幾乎可以說沒有，這樣子來比較FHD/QHD就比較馬虎了8F 05/31 11:33

推 jayjoe:這篇關於cpu測試我認為比較符合 WD很吃cpu的16F 05/31 14:13

→ jeff0811:就是說e3 v2裝到780ti也頂多50張.....17F 05/31 14:17

→ friedpig:660沒寫幾G的? 660 2G不是有Vram的問題如果是2G
FPS突然暴跌好像也不意外18F 05/31 21:34

硬體資訊在這裡
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/watch-dogs-pc-performance,3833-3.html

How We Tested Watch Dogs

I wanted to test Watch Dogs in Surround and Eyefinity configurations, using three monitors, but wasn't able to get the aspect ratio correct using either GeForce or Radeon cards. Hopefully this is something the developers address in a patch. For now, we... ...

GTX-660 2G
另外一個爆跌的 R7-260x 是 1G
※ 編輯: arrenwu (67.194.232.103), 05/31/2014 21:37:13

--