※ 引述《usnavyseal (usmarine2008)》之銘言： : ※ 引述《yochiya (漂浮)》之銘言： : : https://x.com/HeatCulture13/status/2011569364877574432 : : Rich Paul回應他之前關於「用Austin Reaves交易Jaren Jackson Jr」的說法 : : ，而Max Kellerman(資深評論員，富保羅的podcast搭檔)則表示湖人需要交易Luka。 : : Rich Paul： : : 我跟我的朋友Reggie(AR的經紀人）聊過，我跟他說:聽著Reggie，你是我兄弟，我希望 : : Austin知道，這件事完全不是針對Austin Reaves，因為我很愛這名球員，也很喜歡這個 : : 人。第二，我其實還需要他幫我提升高爾夫球技，我不想搞砸任何和AR有關的事情。 : : 這只是一個假設性的觀點，並不是什麼真的會發生的事。再者，我反而覺得這對AR是一 : : 種肯定，因為他在一支擁有兩位未來名人堂球員的球隊裡，而他被視為「資產」。 : : 我真的不是想影響AR的任何事情！ : : Max Kellerman:如果我是湖人，我會非常認真地考慮把Luka交易掉。 : https://open.spotify.com/episode/5NdC2FrRObPcIJW4NrOeVx 28:14開始 : 補充後面的內容 : Max: Unless you want to move Luka. Like, you know, we all know the reality. : Look, honestly, who would you rather do if you were the Lakers and Box Office : is not trying to get them all in? : 除非你想動 Luka。大家都知道現實狀況。老實說，如果你是湖人，而你並不打算把這兩 : 個人（Luka 和 Reaves）都留著的話，你會選誰？ : Rich: No. No, you're not. You're not going to do that, Max : 不、不，Max。你不能那樣(釣) : Max: Okay, let me say what I would do. If I were the Lakers, I would give : serious consideration to moving Luka, and I'll tell you why. Oh, my God. : 好，讓我說說我會怎麼做。如果我是湖人，我會認真考慮交易 Luka，我告訴你為什麼。 : Rich: Oh my god 我的天啊 : Max: If you believe there's a redundancy, Austin and Luka, Luka's a better : player than Austin Reaves. I understand that. Luka's a fantastic player, : offensively. But if you want to win a championship, I believe that your best : player needs to be someone who is willing to at least play team defense, : like Steph Curry, bad defender. Steph's a bad defender, but he is a willing : defender. It's not his fault he's not good at it. He's just built that way, : whatever. But he's a great offensive player, not a great defensive player, : but he's a willing team defender, so the Warriors can field championship : teams. If your best player isn't that, very hard to win a championship. : 如果你認為 Austin 和Luka功能重疊，雖然我明白 Luka 是比 Austin 更好的球員，他的 : 進攻完美。但若你想贏得總冠軍，我認為球隊最好的球員至少得願意參與「團隊防守」。 : 像是Curry，他防守不好，但他願意防，守不好不是他的錯，體型就那樣。但正因為他願 : 意參與防守，勇士才能打造奪冠陣容。如果你最強的球員不願意防守，那很難奪冠。 : There is a world in which, if you're really trying to win a championship and : you're the Lakers, you go, I can get X Luka and Austin are redundant. I can : get X for Austin. I can get three X for Luka. You might consider moving Luka. : This is me saying it. But do you agree with that, Rich? : 所以在某些情況下，如果你是湖人且真的想奪冠，你會想：Luka 和 Austin 功能重疊。 : 賣掉 Austin 我可以換到 X 籌碼，但賣掉 Luka 我可以換到 3倍的X籌碼。 : 你可能會考慮動Luka，這些話是我說的，但Rich，你同意嗎？ : Rich: Here's what I will say. I will say this, and this is complementary to : AR. If you were sitting here and you said, Rich, you take this one, I'll take : that one. I'm not saying they're equal players, but what I am saying is, howev : er you want me to start to then build the rest of my team, I'm fine either way : 我會這樣說，這對 AR來說是一種稱讚。如果你坐在這裡對我說： : 「Rich，這兩個人你選一個，另一個給我。」我不是說這兩個人等級相等， : 但我想表達的是：不管你要我用誰作為起點，來建立我剩下的陣容，我兩個都可以接受。: : Max: With Luka or Austin, in other words, you have to choose one because : they're redundant. : 換句話說，因為他們功能重疊，你必須在 Luka 或 Austin 之間選一個。: : Rich: All I'm saying is, I can build a team either way. Now, for the people : that want to talk about, that want to play fantasy basketball, I'm not : playing fantasy basketball. We're talking about hypotheticals. : This does not mean you want somebody to be traded and there's some insider : information in the locker room and this is not a LeBron thing. This is not : any of that. But if you want to be educated in this case, then I think I fit : the bill to educate you. : 我只是說：不管選哪個，我都能組出一支球隊。 : 至於那些想要聊、想要玩fantasy basketball的人——我不是在玩fantasy basketball。 : 我們只是在談假設情境。這不代表你真的想把誰交易掉、也不代表更衣室裡有什麼內線消 : 息，更不是什麼「LeBron 的意思」。都不是那回事。 : 但如果你在這種情境下想受點教育，那我覺得我很符合資格來「教育你」。 : 備註 : 原來是因為Luka不願意防守 但皇帝就沒有這個問題XD