---

  這是昨晚寫給BBC的，英文不好不要罵我><

Thanks for your advice for government of Taiwan execution death penalty,I
come from Taiwan. Indeed more than 80% of the public support for the death
penalty in Taiwan,but have you ever think about why cause this?
Because a large amount of news about homicides in Taiwan even the social
order almost more than half of the Taiwan's newspaper,had the daily news
reported almost a large number of homicides in Western nations such as BBC or
CNN ? If Taiwan do not execution the death penalty,how can stability Taiwanese
？Although natural human rights,however, when the murderer deprive other
people's lives
and show no remorse,why nation can't deprive their of human rights?
Compared with other countries whose execution the death penalty,Taiwan
considered more humanely such injecting anesthetic to the condemned criminal
before executing by shooting.
Some states in the U.S.use the electric chair electrocution those condemned
criminal and others using toxic drugs ,why not your condemn such nation
because of their aircraft carrier？And when the executed by hanging such as
Japan, you also have no dare condemned because of your need the product in
Japan？In fact
of the Chinese Communist Party，you afraid for condemning their execution of
death penalty because of their powerful arms and the development fleet?
If your claimed the human rights based on benefit and force,then it only been
the excuse that human rights to interfere of Taiwan's internal affairs.From
the killings event by Norway,even nearly of 40% population from European
Union countries calling for restoration of the death penalty.Recent shootings
event in the U.S. caught the world by surprise,U.S fearful of abolish the
death penalty,so I that the public security in Taiwan much corrupted so why
we must abolishing death penalty ,for Taiwan haven't
nuclear weapons and the aircraft carrier?
As far as I know, in some countries of the European Union were forced to
participate in the abolition of the death penalty rather than voluntary, so
the abolition of the death penalty is not the mainstream of the world. I have
curious if the abolition of the death penalty not an really international
trend, why Amnesty International and the European Union repeatedly
intervention Taiwan executed and not dare to intervention of the United
States and Japan?
People have rights from avoidance murderer killing and causing fear in which
the value of existing for death penalty. Many reports in the Chinese website
that these countries people requirement restoration of the death penalty ,
since the Norway killings event.
Former Japanese Prime Minister Ito Hirobumi had been said, when force equal
to the two countries，the Foreign Affairs is powerful, but when the two force
be great disparity,the force is a diplomatic means. In my views, you think
Taiwan easy bullying so braving in condemn?
We sincerely hope that you will understand the current situation of public
order, rather than take the excuse of human rights to intimidate the
Taiwanese government rather than just listen the wrong information by the
Taiwan's abolition of the death penalty alliances.Thank you.

中文翻譯如下︰
感謝你們對台灣政府執行死刑提出建議，我來自台灣。事實上，超過80％的民眾支持
台灣保有死刑，然而你有沒有想過為什麼會這樣呢？

因為台灣新聞大量報導凶殺案，治安問題甚至在台灣報紙佔據幾乎超過一半的版面，難道
西方國家每日新聞報導有報導一大堆兇殺案像是BBC或CNN嗎？如果台灣不執行死刑，怎
麼能穩住台灣人心？雖然天賦人權，然而，當兇手剝奪其他人的生命還毫無悔意，為什
麼國家不能剝奪他們的人權呢？

相較其他執行死刑的國家，台灣更加考慮人道主義，像是在槍斃前給被定罪的罪犯注射麻
醉劑。


展中的艦隊嗎？





人民有權利避免被兇手殺害，有權利拒絕生活在它所帶來的恐懼中，死刑的價值即在此。
中國網站的許多報導中，這些國家的人民因為挪威的屠殺事件，而要求恢復死刑。

日本前首相伊藤博文曾說，當兩國力量相等時，外交就是力量，但是當兩國力量相距甚遠
時，力量就成了外交手段。我的看法是，你認為台灣容易欺負，所以才勇於聲討嗎？

我們真誠地希望你會了解當前社會治安的形勢，而不是只聽台灣廢死聯盟的錯誤信息，以
人權為藉口恐嚇台灣政府，謝謝。


寫給CNN的︰

The European Union and Amnesty International condemned Taiwan's Government
Ministry of Justice executing by shooting condemned criminals,many Taiwanese
protest against these organizations to interfere in Taiwan's internal
affairs.The Taiwanese disgusted with the abolition of the death penalty
alliance (ADPA)for the following factors:
1.Forced the families of the victims to forgiveness criminals:
the Taiwanese ADPA often purposely created a public opinion and using an
excuse by resorting to morality threatening and pressured the victims (or
their relatives) forgave the perpetrators , otherwise they would criticized
severely for victims's intolerance and uncharitable. In fact, reject to
forgive the perpetrators does not mean reject to accept the concept of the
abolition of the death penalty.But ADPA forced the families of the victims to
forgive the perpetrators increased the resistance of the abolition of the
death penalty.
The conception that unconditionally to forgive perpetrators were also out of
tune with the Taiwanese culture, especially by the relatives of the victims
appeared personally to replace the victim forgiving the perpetrators (for
example, the parents who forgave the teacher and the relatives abuse child
induce loss the children's rights ).And victims's kind-hearted made the
reduce perpetrators's punishments but causing more victims in the future
situation (especially significantly for rapist ).
2.Serious imbalance for ratio of concerned about both sides :
when ADPA implementation their ideas often usually over-emphasized the human
right of abuser and perpetrators but intentionally ignored the human rights
of the victims . While enforced to forgive perpetrators but denounced some
objector ,even aced legal lawsuits. Thus let the Taiwan social negative
feeling that support ADPA's ideas simply to protect the villains and
devastated kind people.
3.Outdated For example:
ADPA often illustrated a few decades ago to imply the possibility of
miscarriage of justice, but deliberately ignore the fact that advancement for
criminal investigation mechanism . Today those facing the death penalty
judgement process and proof of offenses were much smaller than in the past
controversial.
At the same time, ADPA also deliberately ignored or demoted those unfavorable
change the attitude for the abolition of the death penalty by some countries
that abolished the death penalty in recent years or really abolition of the
death penalty (such Turkey, Canada, Japan, the United Kingdom, the
Philippines and other countries abolished the death penalty or really
abolition of the death penalty, the public opinion on the majority support
they need restoration of the death penalty).
4.Refused to suggest concrete the practicable alternative act:
if ADPA were willing to suggest the alternative of imprisonment for life
without parole and turn it into law, may can reduction of social resentment
and get the support of the death penalty whose support, and not only let the
judges could according the laws to isolating criminals without using of the
death penalty but also reducing resistance to abolition of the death penalty.
But ADEA actually require abolition for life imprisonment without parole, it
result improbable reason and trigger a wide intensive resentment in Taiwan.
5.Often by using foreign pressure requirements to abolition of the death
penalty:
ADPA often polemical at basis of European countries 、International Universal
Declaration of Human Rights、or UN resolutions and other foreign documents in
order to turn the screws and condemned Taiwan's government ,but ignored
divergence cultural and social divide with Taiwan and the whole East Asia
even with European countries . The European countries fueled abolition of the
death penalty by historical, religious factors but also spent nearly a
century of time to gradually abolition of death penalty (especially act until
the end of the twentieth century of France ) .
It shows the abolition of the death penalty can't to achieved overnight and
arbitrarily implementation. By using of foreign forces may easy to arouse
nationalist to against and raise doubts and difficult questions for
discussion to ADPA and induce resentment that "interference in Taiwan's
internal affairs"

中文翻譯︰
國際特赦組織和歐盟對於台灣法務部槍決六名死囚提出譴責,許多台灣人抗議這些組織干
涉台灣內政.而台灣人對於廢死聯盟(ADPA)普遍感到反感的原因為:













有文法錯誤還請見諒 懶的再翻回中文了 抱歉！

--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.171.19.236
※ 編輯: Yoshikia        來自: 118.171.19.236       (12/24 22:40)

--