1+2+3+4+...=-1/12?李永乐老师讲黎曼猜想(1) - YouTube
最近数学圈爆出一个大新闻 英国数学家阿蒂亚(Michael Atiyah)爵士 宣布自己证明了黎曼猜想 并将在9月24号的获奖者论坛上宣读自己的论文 因为阿蒂亚爵士是阿贝尔奖和菲尔兹奖的双料得主 世界顶级的数学家之一 而黎曼猜想又是150多年来没有人能够解决 但是又特别重要的数学猜想 所以这则新闻一出一下子就引爆...













 










Riemann Hypothesis - Numberphile - YouTube
Here is the biggest (?) unsolved problem in maths... The Riemann Hypothesis. More links & stuff in full description below ↓↓↓ Prime Number Theorem:










看板 ott
作者 ott (寶貝)
標題 
	
The Riemann Hypothesis

時間 2012年09月12日 Wed. AM 08:23:22


       

http://primes.utm.edu/notes/rh.html

   
 




When studying the distribution of prime numbers Riemann extended
        Euler's zeta function (defined just for s with real part greater
        than one)
       

         

         
ALT="zeta(s) = 1 + 2^(-s) + 3^(-s) + 4^(-s)..." HEIGHT=60 WIDTH=300> 
       

        to the entire complex plane (sans simple pole at s = 1).         Riemann
        noted that his zeta function had trivial zeros at -2, -4, -6, ...;
        that all nontrivial zeros were symmetric about the
        line Re(s)
        = 1/2; and that the few he calculated were on that line.  The Riemann hypothesis is that all nontrivial zeros are
        on this line.
  Proving the Riemann Hypothesis would allow us
        to greatly sharpen many number theoretical results.  For example,
        in 1901 von Koch showed that the Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to: 
       

         

          [pnt + error term] 
       

       

But it would not make factoring any easier!           There
          are a couple standard ways to generalize the Riemann hypothesis..


     

     

1. The Riemann Hypothesis:


     

Euler studied the sum 
       


         

          zeta(s) = 1 + 2^(-s) +<br />
<br />
3^(-s) + 4^(-s)... 
       

        for integers s>1 (clearly 
ALT="zeta" NOSAVE HEIGHT=15 WIDTH=9 ALIGN=ABSCENTER>(1) is infinite).  Euler
        discovered a formula relating zeta
WIDTH=9 ALIGN=ABSCENTER>(2k) to the Bernoulli numbers yielding results
        such as 
SRC="http://primes.utm.edu/gifs/zeta_2.gif" ALT="zeta(2)=pi^2/6" NOSAVE HEIGHT=21 WIDTH=75> and zeta(4)=pi^4/90.  But
        what has this got to do with the primes?  The answer is in the following
        product taken over the primes p (also discovered by Euler): 
       

         

          [Euler's Prod]
HEIGHT=60 WIDTH=150> 
       

        Euler wrote this as 
       

         

          [Euler's Prod]
HEIGHT=60 WIDTH=400> 
       

        Riemann later extended the definition of 
SRC="http://primes.utm.edu/gifs/zeta.gif" ALT="zeta" >(s) to all complex numbers s (except
        the simple pole at s=1 with residue one).  Euler's product still
        holds if the real part of s is greater than one.  Riemann derived
        the functional equation of the Riemann zeta function: 
       

         

          [Functional Eq]
HEIGHT=44 WIDTH=275> 
       

        where the gamma function gamma
>(s) is the well-known extension of the factorial function (
SRC="http://primes.utm.edu/gifs/gamma.gif" ALT="gamma" NOSAVE HEIGHT=11

WIDTH=11>(n+1) = n! for non-negative integers n): 
       

         

          [def of gamma]
HEIGHT=60 WIDTH=275> 
       

        (Here the integral form holds if the real part of s is greater
        than one, and the product form holds for all complex numbers s.) 
     

The Riemann zeta function has the trivial zeros at -2, -4, -6,
        ... (the poles of 
SRC="http://primes.utm.edu/gifs/gamma.gif" ALT="gamma" >(s/2)).  Using the Euler product
        (with the functional equation) it is easy to show that all the other
        zeros are in the critical strip of non-real complex numbers with
        0 <        Re(s) < 1, and that they are symmetric
        about the critical
        line
 Re(s)=1/2.  The unproved Riemann hypothesis is
        that all of the nontrivial zeros are actually on the critical line. 
     

In 1986 it was shown that the first 1,500,000,001 nontrivial zeros of
        the Riemann zeta function do indeed have real part one-half [VTW86].  Hardy
        proved in 1915 that an infinite number of the zeros do occur on the critical
        line and in 1989 Conrey showed that over 40% of the zeros in the critical
        strip are on the critical line [Conrey89].  However, there is
        still a chance that the Riemann hypothesis is false.  From August
        of 2001 through 2005, Sebastian Wedeniwski ran ZetaGrid which
      verified that the first 100 billion zeros were on the critical line.      
     

2. Who cares?      


     

In 1900 Hilbert listed proving or disproving this hypothesis as one
        of the most important unsolved problems confronting modern mathematics
        and it is central to understanding the overall distribution of the primes. 
When Hadamard and de la Vallee Poussin proved the prime
          number theorem, they actually showed

       
       


          pi(x) = Li(x) + O(x*e^(-a*sqrt(log x)))
       


       

for some positive constant a, and they did this by bounding the
        real part of the zeros in the critical strip away from 0 and 1.  The
        error term is directly dependent on what was known about the zero-free
        region within the critical strip.  As our
        knowledge of the size of this region increases, the error term decreases.         In
        fact, in 1901 von Koch showed that the Riemann hypothesis is equivalent
        to


       


            pi(x) = Li(x) + O(x^(1/2)log x) WIDTH=197>       


     

 There are many results like this, see, for example [[url=../references/refs.cgi/BS96]BS96[/url]].      
     



Generalizations of RH


Recall again our starting point from Euler:


     

          ALT="zeta(s) = 1 + 2^(-s) + 3^(-s) + 4^(-s)..." HEIGHT=60 WIDTH=300>


     

Why should the numerators all be one?   One important
        way to alter the series is to replace the numerators with functions χ(n)
        called Dirichlet characters (these can be viewed as functions for which
        there exists a positive integer k with χ(n + k)
        = χ(n)
        for all n, and with χ(n) = 0 whenever gcd(n, k) > 1).   The
        resulting infinite sum L(?,s) is a Dirichlet L-function.   Once
        again we analytically continue the function to one that is meromophic
        on the entire complex plane.   The extended
      Riemann Hypothesis
 is that for every Dirichlet character χ and
      the zeros L(χ,s) = 0 with 0 < Re(s) < 1, have
      real part 1/2.  The distributions of the zeros of these L-functions
      are closely related to the number of primes in arithmetic progressions
      with a fixed difference k.   Should the extended Riemann Hypothesis
      be proven, then [url=../prove/prove2_3.html]Miller's
      test[/url] would provide an efficient primality proof for general numbers.       See,
      for example, [[url=../references/refs.cgi/BS96]BS96[/url] 8.5-6].



   
 

Another way to generalize Euler's sum is to leave the
    field of rational numbers, and replace the denominators with the norms of
    the non-zero ideals (special sets of elements) in a finite field extention
    of the rationals K (called
    a number field).   The resulting sum is the Dedekind zeta-function of K and
    can again be analytically continued.   These zeta functions also have
    a simple pole at zero and infinitely many zero in the critical region.  The generalized
    Riemann Hypothesis
    is again that the zeros in the critical region
    all have real part 1/2.  See, for example, [[url=../references/refs.cgi/BS96]BS96[/url] 8.7].




 
 
 


[圖]
 




※ 編輯: ott 時間: 2018-12-05 17:10:04
※ 看板: ott 文章推薦值: 0 目前人氣: 0 累積人氣: 130 
分享網址: 複製 已複製
guest
x)推文 r)回覆 e)編輯 d)刪除 M)收藏 ^x)轉錄 同主題: =)首篇 [)上篇 ])下篇