cambridgeswss 於 2011-11-24 上傳
Activists from Cambridge Defend Education shutdown David Willetts' talk at the University of Cambridge
類別:
非營利組織與行動主義
標記:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear David Willetts /
The future does not belong to you. / This is an epistle / which is addressed to you. / But it is written / for those who will come after us. / Why? / Because we do not respect your right / to occupy the platform this evening. / Your name / is anathema to us. / You are not a welcome guest / because you come with a knife / concealed beneath your cloak. / Behind your toothy smiles, / we have already seen / the fixed gaze of the hired assassin. / You have transgressed / against all codes of hospitality. / That is why / we interrupt your performance tonight, / because nothing is up for debate here; / your mind is made up; / you are not for turning. / All your questioners have been planted. / So we, too, have planted ourselves / in your audience. / We stole in quietly, / without much fanfare / – because we know your tactics - / but now that we are here, / we will not wait to be told / before we speak. /
You have professed your commitment / to the religion of choice / but you leave us with no choice. / You are a man / who believes in the market / and in the power of competition / to drive up quality. / But look to the world around you: / your gods have failed. / They were capricious gods / and we do not mourn them, / nor do we seek new ones.
Fools that we are, / we took you at your word: / so we are clambering into the driving seat / because your steering is uncomfortable to us / and your destination / is not one of our choosing.
Even the very metaphor betrays you. / So let us begin / by activating the emergency brake: / the University is no motor vehicle, / to be souped up, / ideologically re-tuned, / intellectually re-fitted, / cosmetically re-sprayed, / and then sent out onto the highway, / like some gaudy engine of the ‘knowledge economy’, / emitting noxious filth / and polluting the air. / The road itself is narrow; / your eyes are fixed on a vanishing horizon / which you will never quite reach. / You have picked a route / which skirts carefully around / all redoubts of human warmth and solidarity. / Look elsewhere for your metaphors, David. / We have no desire / to be put into the driving seat. / There are chairs enough in our libraries – / would that there were more libraries – / and these are the only seats of learning / that we would wish to know. / We will not used / by you. / We do not wish to ‘rate’ our teachers; / we wish to learn from them. / We are not consumers; / we are students – / and we will stand with our teachers / on their picket lines.
Your soulless vision of efficiency; / your mechanistic frameworks of ‘excellence’; / your chummy invitation / to hop on board / and serve the needs of the Economy: / all of this makes it clear to us / that you have set out from a false premise, / because guess what, David: / you cannot quantify knowledge. / Your craven desperation to do so / tells us only one thing: / you are trying to discipline us, / but we will not be disciplined, / because we are schooled / in a different kind of pedagogy. / You cannot steal our honey, David. / It will go sour for you. / You can process all the information / that you wish / but your project is doomed to fail. / We thought we should let you know – / out of kindness, mainly. / If you want to make us / the processors of the information / that is useful to you; / if you want to smother / the capacity for critical thought: / so be it. / We understand that you do not like / to be told that you are wrong. / So we understand / that you do not want us to think / too rigorously, or too critically. / So go on: / lobotomise us. / Tell us that we are beyond the pale. / Make us over / into the drones and ciphers / of your economy. / Your world will be the poorer. / We will continue to nourish our traditions / in the crevices and dark corners / that you forget / and that you cannot touch. /
It is almost inappropriate / to lay out to you / the terms of your own wrongness. / But has it not occurred to you / that the ‘vocation’ of scholarship / far from leading to a profession / may in fact preclude it? / Or is it that you are more of a capital calf / than you are letting on? / Is it that the Brave New World / you are trying to inaugurate / will, in fact, preclude scholarship? /
We have tasted companionship / in a way that you cannot know. / We have a singleness of heart. / And, unlike you, / we none of us believe / that any of our possessions are our own. / You will not find us / in any of your statistical surveys; / our ‘student experience’ cannot be measured / by your instruments. / Woe to every scorner and mocker / who collects wealth / and counts it. / We are both measurably younger / and immeasurably older / than you. / You have already lost. / You have lost the initiative. / You have lost the debate. / You have lost your sense of decorum. /
We are closer than you think. / So it does not surprise us / that you are worried. / You can try to intimidate us; / you can threaten to shoot us / with rubber bullets; / you can arrest us; / you can imprison us; / you can criminalise our dissent; / you can blight a hundred thousand lives, / slowly, and one-by-one, / but you cannot break us / because we are more resolute, / more numerous, / and more determined than you. / And we are closer than you think. / So it does not surprise us / that you are scared. / It is not that you lack our confidence – / you never had it – / the nub of the issue is this: / you do not have confidence in yourself. / Go home, David. / And learn your gods anew.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
--
※ 編輯: ott 時間: 2012-03-19 05:51:12
※ 看板: English 文章推薦值: 0 目前人氣: 0 累積人氣: 84
回列表(←)
分享