看板 Stock作者 okokok666666 ( OK 六六大順)標題 [其他]舊聞:RH同意支付6500萬美元與SEC和解時間 Sun Jan 31 21:07:41 2021
新聞於2020.12發布,也算是近期的
全文如下連結,僅就重點做結語 (英文不好請見諒)
SEC發現,Robinhood對使用者的賣點之一是交易“免佣金"
但Robinhood收入來源之一,是將客戶的交易資料exchange給"交易機構"
SEC發現,即使Robinhood使用者因為不付佣金而節省下來的費用,
Robinhood也從這些使用者身上剝奪了3,410萬美元
Robinhood同意支付6500萬美元來解決這些指控。
https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2020-321
According to the SEC’s order, between 2015 and late 2018,
Robinhood made misleading statements and omissions in customer communications,
including in FAQ pages on its website, about its largest revenue source
when describing how it made money – namely, payments from trading firms
in exchange for Robinhood sending its customer orders to those firms
for execution, also known as “payment for order flow.”
As the SEC’s order finds, one of Robinhood’s selling points to customers
was that trading was “commission free,”
but due in large part to its unusually high payment for order flow rates,
Robinhood customers’ orders were executed at prices that were
inferior to other brokers’ prices.
Despite this, according to the SEC’s order,
Robinhood falsely claimed in a website FAQ between
October 2018 and June 2019 that its execution quality matched or beat that
of its competitors.
The order finds that Robinhood provided inferior trade prices that
in aggregate deprived customers of $34.1 million even after taking into
account the savings from not paying a commission.
Robinhood made these false and misleading statements during the time
in which it was growing rapidly.
https://reurl.cc/3NjEOV
在搭配華爾街日報新聞:
RH把使用者購買或出售股票或期權的訂單資料,賣給高頻交易公司來收取費用
這種做法被稱為訂單流支付,是零售經紀人執行客戶交易的一種常見方式。
批評人士說,訂單流支付會給出售訂單的經紀人造成利益衝突。
這種做法疑慮,因為這可能導致老練的交易者剝削投資人
--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.136.176.32 (臺灣)
※ 文章代碼(AID): #1W5gkW0X (Stock)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Stock/M.1612098464.A.021.html
推 peter080808: 難怪散戶永遠不會贏
散戶下單早就被投信知道了 早步插隊再轉給散戶2F 01/31 21:08
推 hate0322: 原來是情蒐公司 還以為是券商呢4F 01/31 21:09
→ abramtw: 難怪我買就跌 賣就漲 就說我被盯上阿6F 01/31 21:14
→ willism: 講過多次啦,免費券商不都如此7F 01/31 21:14
→ izplus: 看來英國研究要重新定義Rohin Hood10F 01/31 21:17
推 hate0322: 不過收手續費的券商說不定也這麼搞就是了......12F 01/31 21:22
推 modhairs: 支付6500萬來解決...看來RH從中賺更多,這水好深13F 01/31 21:27
推 heybro: 原來是贖罪券的概念14F 01/31 21:27
→ BoXeX: 不知道台灣有沒有這樣玩15F 01/31 21:29
→ YLTYY: 看吧,早說被大戶狙擊了16F 01/31 21:40
推 lovetina: 韭菜到哪都是韭菜................17F 01/31 21:46
推 Sinkage: 現代羅賓漢 劫貧濟富19F 01/31 21:56
推 ktan: 被電腦叮上,他插隊在你前面下單,你永遠都在抬轎,抬不完轎,永恆海石頭,手續費也比你便宜20F 01/31 21:56
→ wawi2: 這個其實沒多大的影響 長期投資沒差別
炒短線就有差...23F 01/31 22:07
推 xo7796: 無本當沖…這個就是本(整體散戶平均而言)25F 01/31 22:20
推 dnm08: 韭菜就是被收割,不是大戶就是券商。26F 01/31 22:27
推 guanting886: 中/台地下期貨商表示:ㄏㄏ 數據分析這種以前就玩膩了28F 01/31 22:38
推 m1234: 只要統計大家的觀察名單是那些股票,就可以牟利了32F 01/31 23:18
→ willism: 券商的Sec 606表,會告訴你他怎麼賺錢的,賣一筆給高頻交易商(ex. citadel)可以拿多少。
收手續費的券商,以IB PRO為例,他就保證單子是直接發去交易所。
以firstrade為例,19年q3在NYSE和NASDAQ,單子會送去兩個地方交割,Apex clearing corporation和Citadel。這兩家拿單的比例大概是1:2。前者平均回饋金是每股$0.0012,後者是$0.001。
反正這是合法行為,挑啥券商都是個人選擇33F 01/31 23:27
--