看板 NBA作者 mhfu ()標題 [情報] 西河第五戰可能被禁賽時間 Wed Apr 25 08:06:15 2018
消息來源:
https://goo.gl/7iBCZA
內容:
The NBA has a hard rule during altercations: Any players who leave the bench area receives a one-game suspension. Intent doesn’t matter.
It’s not negotiable. The league simply doesnt want more players entering a fracas.
Russell Westbrook found a gray area last night.
The Thunder star was waiting to check into Oklahoma City’s Game 4 loss to the Jazz when Raymond Felton fouled Rudy Gobert, um, unpleasantly.
Gobert and Felton got into it, though not immediately. Once they did, Westbrook walked onto the court, and he and Gobert swiped at each other.
Gobert and Felton eventually received technical fouls. But could harsher punishment be in store, especially for Westbrook?
Andy Larsen of KSL.com:
"A pool reporter request to the game officials to ask them about the play was initiated, but the NBA indicated that the officials wouldn't c
omment on the matter because it would be reviewed by the league’s disciplinary committee."
The key question should be: Did a referee already beckon Westbrook into the game? If one did, Westbrook shouldn’t be suspended. If none did,
Westbrook should be suspended. The league will talk to the refs and get a better understanding of what happened. Their account matters most.
But one indicator working against Westbrook: Steven Adams – whose toughness is beyond reproach – was also waiting to check in and stayed
on the sideline. If Adams had already entered the game, wouldn’t he have gotten involved? Maybe not, but his hanging back is circumstantial
evidence pointing toward a Westbrook suspension. Again, though, the referees’ accounts matter far more.
大意:
西河在第四戰的時候疑似離開板凳區。 在Felton對Gobert犯規後,雷霆準備把他換上場但又還沒真的上場。後來Gobert跟Felton衝突後,他衝上來加入戰局
現在聯盟正在調查,看到底西河在場上是不是裁判允許的。
補充:
https://goo.gl/Mr5N8Y <- 判決已出 沒被禁
短評或心得:好像太衝動了?
--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 108.224.94.94
※ 文章代碼(AID): #1QtyPzuG (NBA)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1524614781.A.E10.html
推 LabaK: 雷霆利多5F 04/25 08:07
推 sesee: 雷霆不讓了~~~11F 04/25 08:09
推 vgil: 你爵危險了12F 04/25 08:09
推 lynnhen: 怎麼可能禁賽~ 這麼偏袒龜~13F 04/25 08:09
推 ass499: 亞當解放?!14F 04/25 08:09
推 ievolnds: 笑死 當天沒吃T結果現在可能被禁賽15F 04/25 08:09
推 User0: 聯盟果然在操控比賽(誤)19F 04/25 08:10
噓 hihiwu: 刷龜禁賽爵士就危險了22F 04/25 08:10
推 lsslz: 整隊脫殼不讓了 直逼冠軍23F 04/25 08:10
推 kausan: 禁龜龜也太偏雷霆了吧24F 04/25 08:10
→ hungys: 判決都出來了 你lag了25F 04/25 08:11
感謝提醒
推 kuloda: 龜龜禁賽對爵士不利26F 04/25 08:11
噓 DarthVader: 紅明顯,昨天裁判看了老半天的螢幕重播,結果假裝沒看到,今天聯盟再補罰錢跟一個T就可以知道雷霆的比賽到底多黑了。29F 04/25 08:12
推 d8456aaa: 判決罰款10000大洋跟1T 感謝聯盟34F 04/25 08:12
推 opse1020: 哇靠為了救雷霆聯盟要出手了?38F 04/25 08:13
噓 DarthVader: 當年太陽一樣衝突離開板凳兩個人被禁賽,如果忍者龜沒禁賽就知道黑雷不是叫假的41F 04/25 08:13
推 nuturewind: 不可能拉...NBA袁紹體系代表之一怎麼可能45F 04/25 08:14
噓 skybin: 爵士又不是騎士,對手主將怎可能禁賽48F 04/25 08:14
→ d8456aaa: 判決出來了 大家別擔心了XDDD51F 04/25 08:14
推 rondoya: 禁賽對爵士不利啊...58F 04/25 08:16
推 FukatsuEri: 爵士:沒關係 我們不在乎 堂堂正正的對決吧(別阿)59F 04/25 08:16
推 fjksa: 禁賽雷霆整隊就解開束縛了 這樣對宅爵好嗎?60F 04/25 08:16
推 AI1: 全隊脫龜殼 塊陶阿64F 04/25 08:17
推 boy1031: 沒西河 起嗎輸20+ 我相信賭盤是誠實的66F 04/25 08:17
推 SULAjardin: 禁,結果雷霆勝,球團食髓知味再傷停2場,連勝3場晉級68F 04/25 08:17
感謝提醒
推 yeslin: PG 瓜瓜 準備脫殼換骨解放囉~~72F 04/25 08:18
噓 uuuc1223: 紅明顯 已經沒競賽了 恭喜爵士
*禁賽73F 04/25 08:18
※ 編輯: mhfu (108.224.94.94), 04/25/2018 08:20:41
推 fishlinghu: Adam 20-20 甜瓜 PG各35分 肥頓15-15 大概會變這樣77F 04/25 08:19
推 Dragic: PG跟甜瓜爆發 爵士輸球的節奏78F 04/25 08:20
※ 編輯: mhfu (108.224.94.94), 04/25/2018 08:21:43
推 biung: 搞不好雷霆起飛了85F 04/25 08:21
推 hmt17: 爽 爵士爽到89F 04/25 08:22
※ 編輯: mhfu (108.224.94.94), 04/25/2018 08:24:24
推 jokethelife: 回到原點裁判若不能當下堅定執法就會把NBA變成一場爛秀91F 04/25 08:24
推 cblade: 解開封印,跑瓜蛋連線起飛97F 04/25 08:26
推 AirLee: 票房需要龜龜247F 04/25 12:19
推 xo1100: 雷霆g5有機會贏了 這下不禁又有懸念248F 04/25 12:22
--