作者 Glamsight (安穩殘憶)標題 [新聞] 鄰近核電廠與癌症死亡率上升相關時間 Wed Feb 25 22:03:24 2026
備註請放最後面 違者新聞文章刪除
1.媒體來源:
※ 例如蘋果日報、自由時報（請參考版規下方的核准媒體名單）
※ Yahoo、MSN、LINE等非直接官方新聞連結不被允許
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
哈佛陳曾熙公共衛生學院（原哈佛公共衛生學院）
2.記者署名:
※ 若新聞沒有記者名字或編輯名字，請勿張貼，否則會被水桶14天
※ 外電至少要有來源或編輯 如:法新社
Maya Brownstein
瑪雅 布朗斯坦
3.完整新聞標題:
※ 標題沒有完整寫出來 ---> 依照板規刪除文章
Proximity to nuclear power plants associated with increased cancer mortality
鄰近核電廠與癌症死亡率上升相關
4.完整新聞內文:
※ 社論特稿都不能貼！違者刪除（政治類水桶3個月)，貼廣告也會被刪除喔！可詳看版規
Boston, MA—U.S. counties located closer to operational nuclear power plants
(NPPs) have higher rates of cancer mortality than those located farther away,
according to a new study led by Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.
麻薩諸塞州波士頓訊——哈佛大學陳曾熙公共衛生學院主導的一項新研究指出，美國境內
鄰近運轉中核電廠的縣市，其癌症死亡率高於距離較遠的地區。
The study is the first of the 21st century to analyze proximity to NPPs and
cancer mortality across all NPPs and every U.S. county. The researchers
emphasized that the findings are not enough to establish causality but do
highlight the need for further research into nuclear power’s health impacts.
這項研究是21世紀首個針對所有核電廠與美國各縣區域進行分析，探討核電廠鄰近性與癌
症死亡率關聯性的研究。研究人員強調，現有發現尚不足以確立因果關係，但確實凸顯了
深入研究核能對健康影響的必要性。
The study was published Feb. 23, 2026, in Nature Communications.
該研究於2026年2月23日發表於《自然通訊》期刊。
Numerous studies on the potential link between NPPs and cancer have been
conducted around the world, with conflicting results. In the U.S., these
studies have been rare and limited in their scope, focused on a single NPP
and its surrounding community.
全球已針對核電廠與癌症的潛在關聯性進行多項研究，但結果相互矛盾。在美國，這類研
究不僅數量稀少，範圍亦相當有限，主要聚焦於單一核電廠及其周邊社區。
To expand the evidence base, the researchers conducted a national assessment
of NPPs and cancer mortality between 2000 and 2018 using “continuous
proximity.” They used advanced statistical modeling that captured the
cumulative impact of all nearby NPPs, rather than just one. The locations and
dates of operation of U.S. NPPs—as well as some nearby in Canada—were
obtained from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, and county-level
data on cancer mortality was obtained from the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention. The researchers controlled for potential confounders in each
county, including educational attainment, median household income, racial
composition, average temperature and relative humidity, smoking prevalence,
BMI, and proximity to the nearest hospital.
為擴展證據基礎，研究人員運用「連續鄰近性」方法，針對2000至2018年間核電廠與癌症
死亡率進行全國性評估。他們採用先進統計模型，捕捉所有鄰近核電廠的累積影響，而非
僅考量單一電廠。美國核電廠的營運地點與日期資料（含部分鄰近加拿大境內廠區）取自
美國能源資訊署，縣級癌症死亡率數據則來自疾病管制與預防中心。研究人員針對各縣潛
在混雜因子進行控制，包含教育程度、家庭收入中位數、種族組成、平均氣溫與相對濕度
、吸菸盛行率、身體質量指數（BMI），以及距最近醫院的距離。
The study found that U.S. counties located closer to nuclear power plants
experienced higher cancer mortality rates, even after accounting for
socioeconomic, environmental, and health care factors. The researchers
estimated that over the course of the study period, roughly 115,000 cancer
deaths across the U.S. (or about 6,400 deaths per year) were attributable to
proximity to NPPs. The association was strongest among older adults.
研究發現，即使在考量社會經濟、環境及醫療保健因素後，鄰近核電廠的美國郡縣仍呈現
較高的癌症死亡率。研究人員估算，在研究期間內，全美約有115,000例癌症死亡（相當
於每年約6,400例）可歸因於鄰近核電廠的因素。此關聯性在年長者群體中尤為顯著。
“Our study suggests that living near a NPP may carry a measurable cancer risk
—one that lessens with distance,” said senior author Petros Koutrakis,
Akira Yamaguchi Professor of Environmental Health and Human Habitation. “We
recommend that more studies be done that address the issue of NPPs and health
impacts, particularly at a time when nuclear power is being promoted as a
clean solution to climate change.”
「我們的研究顯示，居住在核電廠附近可能伴隨可測量的癌症風險——且風險會隨距離增
加而降低，」資深作者、環境健康與人類棲居學教授彼得羅斯· 庫特拉基斯（Petros
Koutrakis）指出。「我們建議應進行更多研究，探討核電廠與健康影響的關聯性，尤其
在當前核能被推崇為應對氣候變遷的潔淨解決方案之際。」
The researchers noted that the results are consistent with the results of a
similar study they conducted in Massachusetts, which identified elevated
cancer incidence among populations living closer to NPPs.
研究人員指出，這項結果與他們在麻薩諸塞州進行的類似研究結果一致，該研究發現居住
在核電廠附近的人口癌症發生率較高。
They also noted some limitations to the study, including that it did not
incorporate direct radiation measurements and instead assumed equal impact by
all NPPs.
他們亦指出該研究存在若干局限性，包括未納入直接輻射測量數據，而是假設所有核電廠
的影響程度均等。
5.完整新聞連結 (或短網址)不可用YAHOO、LINE、MSN等轉載媒體:
※ 當新聞連結過長時，需提供短網址方便網友點擊
https://reurl.cc/QV8mq2
6.備註:
※ 一個人一天只能張貼一則新聞(以天為單位)，被刪或自刪也算額度內，超貼者水桶，請注意
※ 備註請勿張貼三日內新聞(包含連結、標題等)
只聽說過生男還比較多，沒想到......
內文說的研究是這篇
“National Analysis of Cancer Mortality and Proximity to Nuclear Power Plants
in the United States,” Yazan Alwadi, Barrak Alahmad, Carolina L. Zilli
Vieira, Philip J. Landrigan, David C. Christiani, Eric Garshick, Marco
Kaltofen, Brent Coull, Joel Schwartz, John S. Evans, Petros Koutrakis, Nature
Communications, February 23, 2026, doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-69285-4
--
聽音樂都 wav
看影片都 avi
看圖檔都 bmp
拍張照都 raw
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.229.118.8 (臺灣)
※ 作者: Glamsight 2026-02-25 22:03:24
※ 文章代碼(AID): #1fdm4mfM (Gossiping)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1772028208.A.A56.html
→ EXIONG: 一定有差啦 自己經驗 家裡二樓窗戶就是變1F 182.233.103.105 台灣 02/25 22:04
推 MrSherlock: 離火力發電廠近的呢？2F 42.71.26.103 台灣 02/25 22:04
→ EXIONG: 電箱 身體都不好 走了幾個3F 182.233.103.105 台灣 02/25 22:05
→ a27588679: 核能只影響到住附近的 火力可是AOE攻擊4F 180.177.33.135 台灣 02/25 22:05
→ a7788783: 有研究火力或其他形式的發電廠的數據來作對比嗎？ 這種初級的挑話講的找碴方式在人類的惡意顯現上只是小學程度5F 42.71.42.59 台灣 02/25 22:06
就靠你做綜敘研究了
※ 編輯: Glamsight (36.229.118.8 臺灣), 02/25/2026 22:13:38
--