---

※ 引述《uukoQAQ (uuko)》之銘言：
: 來源：
:  https://b23.tv/yOvTn42
: 懶人包，米勒（LPL主播）之前聽說有些LCK隊伍反對雙邊全局BP，因為這樣可以像是Bo5
: 故意先搶走你一套體系，而且讓弱隊跟強隊差距減少
: 之前先鋒賽的時候，Riot有飛去韓國討論，後來結論是為了比賽觀賞性所以要維持全局BP
: 版友怎麼看？ 我自己是覺得全局後好像比較會有下剋上比賽出現
: （當然也有可能是LPL現在都很爛就是了）

在我發的前一篇Joe Marsh訪談文底下推文有提到關於訪談內談論全局BP的部分

雖然虎撲有翻譯版 但覺得好像稍微的加了點水跟情緒進去

(虎撲版: https://m.hupu.com/bbs/632877285 )

所以回去翻一下訪問的字幕

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFTqh4r5wJg

時間是在訪問的13分鐘左右

以下是字幕原文:

"I think the format changed for us too. In the LCK, we go from having two
splits to having one really, really long split. It's a change, like it's
just, it's a lot of changes. And also too, like when you're doing your
off-season, you know, free agency stuff, it was never communicated that that
um... Fearless Draft was going to be anything more than the first stand or
and the LCK cup. Like, and then all of a sudden, mid-cycle, it's like, "Yeah,
we're making it permanent because it's great for the viewership in the West."
It's like, okay, uh, so it was just like you would like to know all the
information to the puzzle before you go to build the puzzle. It's like
imagine having a puzzle, it's like, "We're going to add a hundred pieces to
it." It's like, "Oh, okay." Like, and I think, you know, I think while
Fearless is cool, I think what you're seeing is like as it gets to game five,
it's like a really bad game of solo queue, and whoever has like the more
dominant side selection is likely going to win, right? So it's like, I would
rather like that game five either reset back to you can pick whatever you
want or allow mirror picks where like it could be Zed on Zed. Like, just
don't make it to see who has a bigger champion pool because it's a crappy
League of Legends at that point."


翻譯版







從這段訪談看起來

看起來滿像Joe Marsh的確是站在反對全局BP的立場就是了

但也的確這東西從選手/職業隊伍角度來說 會有人反對也滿正常的



討論看看吧

--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.236.25.107 (臺灣)
※ 作者: c871111116 2025-05-30 10:00:49
※ 文章代碼(AID): #1eEH5LLM (LoL)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1748570453.A.556.html