---

更新，加上一點翻譯。
//Update with some translations.

§ 第二次環析 (全名: 京棧大飯店開發計畫環境影響差異分析) ，結論是『不通過』。
 雖然還沒聽到官方說法，但與會的幾個代表者，是這麼告知小弟的。
//
    The 2nd environmental analysis in affects differentiation of infrastructure development
in National Park Kenting, the unofficial result is: develop denied.
    I received the message on some calls within 24 hours after the meeting, by some of the
representatives in government, business, eco-group, media and related.

  (官方進度: 第一次環差分析 "審核中".. ... 也太lag了吧 囧>)
//The public official progress: "pending" on 1st analysis.. what a lag..
  http://eiareport.epa.gov.tw/EIAWEB/Main3.aspx?func=10&hcode=1020063N&address=&radius=

  (一月廿八日, 某社群網站的第 N 手消息..)
//A fan page released the news on 2nd day.
   https://www.facebook.com/permalink.ph...=55985927150&stream_ref=10 

 喔對了咱還沒跟記者朋友們確認呢.. ... (找名片)
//Oh, should i confirm with medias or whom? (looking for business cards)

----幾個相關新聞----
//Several links related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=futXlKlGTzE
發佈時間：2013年05月02日

http://ourisland.pts.org.tw/content/後灣濕地的陸蟹危機
(12/20/2010)

補充:
//Notes:
http://ourisland.pts.org.tw/content/後灣‧阿朗壹—環境律師團的海角體驗
(生態律師 詹順貴律師?)
//Eco-lawyer, Mr. Jiang?



然後我當天的發言小小脫稿 (大概70%吧XD)
情緒有點被影響到..  嘖嘖，下次會更成熟。
//
And what i actually spoke was quite different than i expected (70% difference or more)
Emotional effects were not easy for a speech newbie like me.

※ 引述《warrenchen》之銘言:
: 先進、長官，以及在地的各位鄉親朋友們，日安。
//Good day, honorable seniors, supervisors, and every friends who concerns the land.

: 很抱歉在對人體生理時鐘最難集中身、心注意力的午後
: 兩點，雅涵本人向各位借用 2'50"的時間，針對此議題
: 思考三個方向：
//Please forgive me to borrow 2 minutes and 50 seconds with you, in order to consider
in 3 topics in this issues, while our mind & body are far from concentrated at such
time (15:00~16:00).  

: A
: B
: C


: 在開始繼續說明問題之前，本人想徵得臺前諸位長官的
: 首肯：請問，哪位是此案的決策負責人？(官、產、學、
: 民 各1位？)
//Before i describe the questions, i would like to request the guarantees from the above:
who shall be the representative in terms of the leaders of opinions? (one in Government,
Industry/Developer, Scholar and Civic for each)
: (暫停3秒)
//(Pause 3 seconds)

: 有此一問，乃因我們老百姓歷年來被太多政府
: 與商人的承諾所背叛，連土地跟財產都被算計了、破壞了
: ，還憨實的幫忙數鈔票。我們也不懂，何以簡單的常情、
: 道理一但與「利益」有關，便要套入法、理、情的邏輯順
: 序，即便後兩者的分析與律法大相逕庭，又或者立法的出
: 發點僅是為了「便民、利眾、定罰則」，在相對無約束力
: 的人情、義理或社會風俗之上，建立具強制性的規範與執
: 行手段，卻偶爾忽視了應以何為本的精神？
//My doubt comes from the experiences over repeatedly betray by government and businessmen,
we stay honest and humble even after our lands were priced, and our houses were destroyed.
We also wonder, how come the common sense and moral issues once have connection with "profit,"
the next step is to apply the frame of logic and law, in terms of "law > logic > sense &
intuition," even the aspect of law differs from others, or the niches of law were made to
"convenient the civics, merit the mass, or line the limitations of punishments.."
Shouldn't the laws were there to establish crucial rules and executable methods above the
boundless logic, moral or social habits, without ignoring the spirit of humanity?

: (暫停3秒)
//(Pause 3 seconds)

: 請各位朋友在檢視【野生動物保護法】、【環境保育法】
: 或相關現行法規前，攤開中華民國憲法，尋找哪個段落提
: 到了「國家的條件」，是否包括「國庫」？要拼經濟，仍
: 要將我們的思維停留在上個世紀的「多就是好、大就是美」，
: 無視環境負載力或者永續平衡的經營嗎？(強氣)
//Before we open the book of laws in "wild animal & game protection," "environment
conservation" or related regulations, let us find the contents of Constitution of ROC,
in which paragraph there mention "the must of a Nation" includes "national treasury?"
For better life, shall we still cap our though in the last half century, since AD 1950,
without considering the eco-affordability or sustainability, in terms of "money first?"
(ff.)
 
: (暫停5秒, 自左至右環視)
//(Pause 5 seconds, looking slowly from left to right)

: 請容本人再次覆述剛才請各位思考的三個問題，作為本人
: 發言的結語。
//As a summary, please allow me to recap again.

: A.B.C.
(其實這三個問題不難。某本【用五個問題就改變一個人的想法】之類的書就有，
 我只是改了說法。或許有機會的話，第二次環評會，再公開吧？)
//
(The 3 three sentences were re-phrased from a book concludes the major 5 questions
 to change one mind. Maybe, i'll share later upon the 2nd environmental evaluation
 meeting?)  

: 本人相信，我們在這齊聚一堂，為的不是解釋問題、說明
: 規劃或分化歧見；而是能夠放下某些執著，用同理心來解
: 決我們已然或尚未看見的癥結，尋求多方共贏的辦法。
: 為補足往年議程文字稿未完全收錄發言及對話，此次議程
: 已即時轉播於公開網站，本人文字稿亦已於 1月12日多語
: 備份於相關網址，以便後續追蹤之用。
What i personally belief is we are here to solve instead of to say,
to have common vision instead of cutting us apart from oneness; we
are here to utilize our sympathy upon each other to cure among the
issues we have known or yet to see, to seek the win-win solution.

As a patch of previous procedure leaks, i have make the video on-line
over several public websites, like Google Hangout and livestream, and
the text has been back-uped on multiple open source, like disp.cc or
blogspot, in case the official meeting log missed the speech of civics
as well as to trace the issue easier.

: Maha Namaste, In Lak'ech!


~~~~Warren Chen

--
※ 作者: guest 時間: 2014-02-09 22:04:58 來自: 60-249-201-9.HINET-IP.hinet.net